#464
Post
by Mr Sausage » Mon May 16, 2022 10:16 am
Devil Hunters (Chun Ku-Lu, 1989)
An adrenaline-fueled, low-budget Girls With Guns film. The action is furious and outlandish in the exact way I like, but the overcranking sometimes makes things a bit Keystone Cops. The plot’s all over the place, there are too many characters, the heroes can jump out of the way of any bullet ever created, a woman is tortured by having locusts thrown at her, and I’m pretty sure Ray Lui was using Robocop’s gun. Which is to say, I had a blast. The film is infamous for having no ending. A mistimed explosion engulfed the three lead actors in flame, burning them severely and shutting down production. Rather than a real ending, the film shows the insane failed stunt several times before putting up a text card praising the actors and wishing for their speedy recovery, followed by a real newspaper clips of the aftermath. It’s in astonishing bad taste. The stunt is insane to watch, and, yeah, over 30 years makes this ancient history. But you’re still watching these actors endure horrific injuries that no doubt left permanent scars (how Sibelle Hu avoided severe facial scarring I don’t know) while the film capitalizes on it for more ticket sales. I’m often left in giddy joy at Hong Kong’s death-defying stunts, and while that final scene is transfixing enough I replayed it several times, the whole thing leaves me conflicted. One of the craziest things I’ve ever seen, but also exploitative of real human suffering.
The Stunt Woman (Ann Hui, 1996)
An episodic semi-autobiographical film about Yeoh’s experience in Hong Kong film industry. Yeoh plays a stunt woman known for taking on risky assignments. She starts out as a casual day laborour on film sets, but through a willingness to endure enormous pain without complaint, quickly becomes a valued member of a stunt team led by Sammo Hung in a performance far outside his norm and, I’m guessing, more true to his actual offscreen nature. The movie has a documentary fascination, giving an inside look at the production of Hong Kong movies, the techniques they use to produce the insane stunts, and the casual, loosely controlled environment it all happens in. That people weren’t dying regularly is surprising. A fascinating look at an industry and also an attitude. Stunt performers as jobbing tradesman in a demanding industry. A portrait too of loneliness, identity, the need for fulfillment. One of the latter sections is interesting since, from what I can gather, it mirrors one of Yeoh’s unhappiest times directly: how she married and was pressured into leaving the industry to be a good housewife, only for neglect and adultery to drive her into divorce and a big return to film. The most troubling section of the film is the last, where the movie ceases its careful, quiet focus on small human dramas and becomes like the action films it had previously been about. It’s strange, but I’m not convinced it wasn’t deliberate. It’s my first Ann Hui, so I’m at a disadvantage when it comes to interpreting her methods. Is she attempting to marry the commercial concerns of Hong Kong cinema with her interest in small human dramas? Appropriately, sadly, Yeoh nearly died filming a fall from a bridge. Footage of her injury is shown over the credits, but unlike the exploitative use of the same in Devil Hunters, the impression the footage gives is of the enormous care and concern all the other stunt performers have for Yeoh as they rush to her aid. It is, by accident, a real life demonstration of the mood and themes of the movie itself.
Angel Terminators (Lieh Wei, 1992)
Another low budget shoot ‘em up brought to life by the excellence of the Hong Kong stunt industry. Good lord, the big battle ending the first act outdoes the climaxes to most action films, culminating in an incredible stunt where a guy is knocked from a platform, bounces off the upraised digging bucket of an excavator, and then plummets fifteen feet to the ground. The rest of the film, despite some amazing scenes, never quite matches it, either, tho’ a late film plummet onto a telephone wire is mind boggling and leads to a grimly poetic final shot. Plot wise, the movie is a mess. There are a number of plot strands that aren’t well explained. Essentially, a mob boss is back in town, the police are after him, a gambling cop and his wife with a past are drawn into the mob boss’ web, it all ends in massive death and destruction. The outline is easy enough to follow; it’s the endless incidents in between that turn it into a jumbled mess, including the fact that two of the main characters aren’t introduced until 2/3 of the movie has elapsed. I’d forgotten Kara Hui was even in this until she turns up randomly. A movie impatient of plot and character and in a hurry to get to the next creative bit of action. I can’t find much to say that I haven’t said about countless similar films in the thread, but for fans of frenetic and illogical Hong Kong action, this is a good choice.
Angel Terminators 2 (Lau Chan & Chun Ku-Lu, 1992)
A sequel in name only. It stars Sibelle Hu, Moon Lee, and Yukari Oshima, ie. the queens of low budget gun fu of the late 80s and 90s. They seem to have a huge fanbase among lovers of these sorts of films, and while the former two didn’t leave much impression on me in Devil Hunters, I found the three to be fun presences here. Lee combines a wide-eyed pixie girlishness with impressive fighting and stunts, and Oshima has a moody, punk attitude along with some serious martial arts abilities (and rocks a pair of pants with “slut” written all over). They’re a fun team. The film has less of the visual creativity of the more prestigious fare, but the stunt and action design is impossibly good and the actors are fun. The plot is all over the place. It’s just a series of things happening to the characters, sometimes logical developments, often not. It’s the same thing as always: the bad guys get so bad that everyone finally bands together to murder them. Not in the top echelon, but a great example of the second rank.
Running out of Time (Johnnie To, 1999)
My first proper Johnnie To movie. A gangster with only months to live orchestrates an elaborate game with a hot shot police negotiator. The fun of the movie, besides the ever-ratcheting tension, is discovering what the game is even about. The movie has a playfulness to it, a sense of black fun as you watch the cop and robber match wits and develop an uneasy camaraderie. There’s a playful humour to even the tensest moments. This is a cinematic game, something you watch, aware it’s constructed, and colluding with the filmmaker to make it all work. It’s very enjoyable.
School on Fire (Ringo Lam, 1988)
A grim, chaotic look at school life in triad infested Hong Kong. What’s so disturbing is the sheer irrationality of the world of the film. All power exercised in the film, legitimate or illegitimate, legal or criminal, is both petty and forcefully misdirected. Institutional authorities like schools and the police are inadequate against the triads, but will overexercise authority against those it feels are really in its grasp, ie. the innocent. The police scream and shout at the kids they drag in as tho’ they were criminals and not scared witnesses, but will essentially cooperate with the triad bosses to keep the situation level. The teachers are no better, with the more committed among them hamstrung by rules and the need not to make waves on the one hand, and bullied by their triad students and the bosses on the other; the rest patently ignore misbehaviour by the connected students, but when it comes to the unconnected, are swift and indiscriminate with punishments and unconcerned with fairness or justice. Then there’s the id-driven emotionality of the triad members, who wield the most direct and persuasive authority, but are unable to govern either each other or themselves. Within this hell of frustration and stasis, innocents suffer pointlessly. Chu Yen-Fong, the protagonist, is caught in a nightmare of absurdity and illogic in which every avenue fails her. A fight breaks out, ostensibly over her, tho’ she speaks all of three words, and a student is killed in the melee. She and every other bystander are dragged in as witnesses. Despite knowing the same as every other bystander, she’s singled out by the triads and ordered to say nothing, but then bullied by the police, threatened with arrest for obstruction, if she doesn’t. The police are uninterested in her safety; her dad, a former triad member, reaches out to a boss to resolve the matter, but that ends up in a huge restaurant brawl as the gangsters show gradeschool levels of interpersonal skills. It’s a terrifying mess in which there are no good options, no freedom, and the punishments are swift and severe. A strong portrait of social despair, one that uses a casual, increasingly frenetic style to take an essentially melodramatic setup, the victimization of an innocent school girl, and turn it into a grounded, persuasive social critique without an ideological lens. That such grim subject matter can become so engrossing and entertaining is a testament to Lam’s skills as a filmmaker. He can navigate between complimentary tones so smoothly that you don’t even notice the transition from jumbled realism to heightened expression to kinetic action and back. Of the six Lam films I’ve seen, this is without question the best.
Taxi Hunter (Herman Yau, 1993)
Falling Down refracted through a Hong Kong lens. Anthony Wong, a meek company man, has an increasingly comical amount of run ins with asshole taxi drivers that culminates in his pregnant wife being dragged by a taxi and killed. So, clad in office shirt and tie like Michael Douglas, he takes up a weapon and begins a campaign of vengeance against taxi drivers while the movie indulges in social satire. What’s bonkers about the movie is that the lead, the man we’re to sympathize with, is essentially a serial killer. I think they were going for a Death Wish vibe, but Charles Bronson was killing people trying to violently assault him. Anthony Wong is just murdering rude taxi drivers. Maybe taxi drivers were a real social problem in Hong Kong at the time and this was all gleefully cathartic, but absent any context the movie is a piece of ethical insanity—a violent revenge fantasy against the annoying and inconvenient. The movie isn’t exactly a satire, but neither is it especially serious. It’s more a burlesque of a serious, socially aware thriller--a piece of rib-poking social provocation. That the movie works at all is down to Anthony’s Wong’s strange performance. He chooses to play his taxi hunter without aggrandizement, giving him the same quiet, mild-mannered demeanor whether he’s talking to his boss or torturing taxi drivers to death. It’s precisely his mildness that makes him so nuts. The movie isn’t especially interesting or creative aside from that. There’s more baffling nuttery in HK movies trying to play things straight.