True Detective

Discuss TV shows old and new.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Persona
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 1:16 pm

Re: True Detective

#326 Post by Persona » Mon Aug 27, 2018 2:12 pm

Kind of a nothing teaser but does seem more promising than Season 2. I was intrigued by the flash to much-older Ali, wonder if they will be a little more playful with the cutting in this one and maybe take a similar approach to time as S1 but more extreme, perhaps?

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: True Detective

#327 Post by domino harvey » Mon Aug 27, 2018 2:15 pm

Someone who worked on the show said on Reddit that it takes place in three eras: the 80s, the 90s, and present day

User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: True Detective

#328 Post by Big Ben » Mon Aug 27, 2018 3:32 pm

This season, much like the first one has to do with missing children. Whether it veers into the Cosmicism of the first season remains to be seen.

User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: True Detective

#329 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:05 pm

2nd trailer. Seems to me like the case is based on the West Memphis Three saga.

User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: True Detective

#330 Post by Big Ben » Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:09 pm

flyonthewall2983 wrote:
Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:05 pm
2nd trailer. Seems to me like the case is based on the West Memphis Three saga.
I was going to say the Jeff Davis Eight. It's got that weird societal corruption where people connected to a certain case just sort of "die" and cops seem to have issues keeping track of evidence. People speculated that the first season was based off of it but Pizzolatto has confirmed that he only heard about it after the first season aired. Creepy stuff.

User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: True Detective

#331 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Wed Jan 16, 2019 2:10 pm

It got off to a good start, I guess. The way it jumps around the timeline is less predictable, and for someone in the prime of his life Ali is surprisingly adept at playing an old man.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: True Detective

#332 Post by domino harvey » Wed Jan 16, 2019 2:14 pm

I'll wait to hear what people say once it's finished before even starting. Not liking forward to another experience like season two

User avatar
Mr Sausage
Not PETA approved
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Canada

True Detective

#333 Post by Mr Sausage » Wed Jan 16, 2019 2:59 pm

This doesn’t resemble season 2 even remotely. It’s a natural continuation of season 1.

I think the biggest draw back so far is that it’s too much like season 1, relying on elaborations of the original’s conceits (not one, but two extra timelines with two depositions) to differentiate itself. It seems like more went into building the structure and atmosphere because the character dynamics aren’t nearly as interesting as season one. But the pay off suggested by the structure is tantalizing enough to hold out hope that the characters will progressively deepen and gain interest. At the moment the detectives are more attitude than personality, save that one exchange in the car following the unwelcome news broadcast.

Also wasn’t a fan of the cheap knock at SJWs early on.

To end on a positive note, the story-telling is superb on a narrative level. For a story told in retrospect across two different timelines, the show is subtle and natural in the way it withholds key details of the mystery that all the characters already know, and in how it suggests without explaining that what people think they know changes across the two later timelines. The show maintains enormous control over what the audience knows and when. That’s a good sign.

User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: True Detective

#334 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:02 pm

Three timelines. And what was the knock on SJWs? The TV show?

User avatar
Mr Sausage
Not PETA approved
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Canada

True Detective

#335 Post by Mr Sausage » Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:08 pm

flyonthewall2983 wrote:Three timelines. And what was the knock on SJWs? The TV show?
Three timelines, but one of those timelines is told in retrospect across the other two.

The knock is when the chipper young white woman comes out with a string of currently popular leftist jargon about race and oppression, and the two black characters purse their lips and share a knowing glance, causing her to wilt in discomfort. There are plenty of legitimate criticisms one can make of leftist discourse, but that was cheap point scoring and little else.

User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:59 pm
Location: Upstate NY

Re: True Detective

#336 Post by Murdoch » Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:29 pm

I watched the first episode. It was alright but sorely lacking in the chemistry of Harrelson and McConaughey. Also it felt a bit strange to me that a whole squad of police would be sent to investigate a missing kid who's been gone for only a few hours.

User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: True Detective

#337 Post by Big Ben » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:02 pm

Murdoch wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:29 pm
I watched the first episode. It was alright but sorely lacking in the chemistry of Harrelson and McConaughey. Also it felt a bit strange to me that a whole squad of police would be sent to investigate a missing kid who's been gone for only a few hours.
There's no actual rule about when you can report a missing person or persons. Police will investigate any claim with merit if there is urgency.
Mr Sausage wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:08 pm

The knock is when the chipper young white woman comes out with a string of currently popular leftist jargon about race and oppression, and the two black characters purse their lips and share a knowing glance, causing her to wilt in discomfort. There are plenty of legitimate criticisms one can make of leftist discourse, but that was cheap point scoring and little else.
I perceived that more as a knock at white feminism more than anything else but I'm wondering now if I read into it wrong.
Last edited by Big Ben on Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

dda1996a
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 6:14 am

Re: True Detective

#338 Post by dda1996a » Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:37 pm

I have only watched Sin Nombre, but Fukunaga was along with the cast and Adam Arkpaw what made season 1, while season 2 was shit. Kicking Saulnier out hasn't really made me excited to give this a try.

User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:59 pm
Location: Upstate NY

Re: True Detective

#339 Post by Murdoch » Wed Jan 16, 2019 6:31 pm

Big Ben wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:02 pm
Murdoch wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:29 pm
I watched the first episode. It was alright but sorely lacking in the chemistry of Harrelson and McConaughey. Also it felt a bit strange to me that a whole squad of police would be sent to investigate a missing kid who's been gone for only a few hours.
There's no actual rule about when you can report a missing person or persons. Police will investigate any claim with merit if there is urgency.
I know, I'm a defense attorney, which made it ring particularly false :lol:

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: True Detective

#340 Post by mfunk9786 » Wed Jan 16, 2019 6:35 pm

I had always thought if a child is in danger, or if someone is acting very out of the ordinary (i.e. so and so takes their morning walk and comes back home at 7 AM every morning for the last decade, but they didn't come home today), etc, those instances are treated a bit differently than ones where someone may have just chosen not to phone home? I would assume you would know better than most of us though, Murdoch. But even though this is set pre-Amber Alert, it still doesn't seem too strange that a missing child would result in a manhunt once a few hours have passed, unless things are just way different now.

User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: True Detective

#341 Post by Big Ben » Wed Jan 16, 2019 7:09 pm

I don't find it all that weird either. There was a disappearance of a young boy in my hometown when I was five and the police response was pretty swift (I recall the panic even at five from all the parents.). This was also the case with the previous victim of the man who committed the crime Nathanial Bar Jonah (NFSW and it's pretty messed up so be warned.). The only reason I have any knowledge of this is because for years afterwards the entire town was paranoid and kids were watched far more closely. Perhaps this is because it occurred in 1996 but I don't think my podunk town would done it differently in the eighties. Disappearances of kids really mess with small towns.

User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:59 pm
Location: Upstate NY

Re: True Detective

#342 Post by Murdoch » Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:31 pm

I don't know, I guess I'm just used to my midsize city ways where a couple cops take a report and, unless there's something to suggest there's an imminent threat of danger to the child, they take a day to question relatives and neighbors. I think the point of this being pre-AMBER makes sense.

It's also that I just wanted a slower build than
SpoilerShow
immediately jumping into a missing child and the subsequent discovery of his corpse in the first episode. The first season had such a brilliant simmer to it whereas in this new season it felt like too much at once - three timelines, the missing kids, the reveal of the girl still being alive, the weird doll by the corpse. The first season allowed some time to set up the two leads, but here it feels like there's as much depth to them as the leads of your token network crime serial.

User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: True Detective

#343 Post by Big Ben » Wed Jan 16, 2019 11:05 pm

I actually don't really think you're necessarily wrong per se. If a cop were to get a call about a teenager for instance (Say fifteen or sixteen) that had a history of run away attempts they'd absolutely not take it as seriously as they would ten year old kids. Even cops in my town have to seriously prioritize due to work load (We actually have less cops than we need.) and if it's immediately pressing they won't do it until they can. It's one of those conditional things were cops will absolutely look into it right away if it's serious. If not they'll wait twenty four hours or even more in some cases so I don't think you're at all in the wrong here. And for the record I actually agree with your spoiler comment although I might be a tad more forgiving because the episode only has sixty minutes to convey something.

I do however feel that these two episodes are much better than Season Two's first two episodes. Hopefully we won't have to suffer through "Don't eat, even if you're hungry" level dialogue anytime soon.

Post Reply