The Simpsons

Discuss TV shows old and new
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Simpsons

#976 Post by domino harvey » Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:27 pm

colinr0380 wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 11:31 am
I feel that Family Guy mostly followed the cues of the Simpsons, given it was coming around the time that the Simpsons was in its eighth or ninth season and was getting into the really outlandish stuff, and then just pushed it even further with its non sequitur cutaway gags (which in the Simpsons commentaries the writers say that they started to shy away from at this time) and anything goes logic.
Family Guy initially found novelty in exploiting this comic tool, but there are only so many variations on the same joke and having an incredibly long cut away where the gag is solely the length of time expended on the cutaway (as in the most famous Family Guy example, the five minute fistfight with the chicken or whatever it was) means that joke works exactly once, but they just kept doing it and as far as I know keep doing it. Maybe these were more valuable to the Simpsons than we give credit though since the decline happened at the same time they went away!

User avatar
dustybooks
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: The Simpsons

#977 Post by dustybooks » Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:41 pm

I love the first season, and rate the first three (plus parts of the seventh) far above everything else. But Domino and I went back and forth on this back during the lists project and I think we left it peacefully... I think.

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: The Simpsons

#978 Post by colinr0380 » Fri Jul 01, 2022 1:27 pm

domino harvey wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:27 pm
Family Guy initially found novelty in exploiting this comic tool, but there are only so many variations on the same joke and having an incredibly long cut away where the gag is solely the length of time expended on the cutaway (as in the most famous Family Guy example, the five minute fistfight with the chicken or whatever it was) means that joke works exactly once, but they just kept doing it and as far as I know keep doing it. Maybe these were more valuable to the Simpsons than we give credit though since the decline happened at the same time they went away!
Yes, the chicken fight was the most obvious thing that Family Guy did in that vein. I did like though that it began as a cut-away gag and eventually grew into interrupting the flow of the episode's story, then became almost its own giant segment, before being seen from a different perspective that obviously inspired Tenet!

Then the Simpsons did it.

User avatar
Mr Sausage
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Canada

Re: The Simpsons

#979 Post by Mr Sausage » Fri Jul 01, 2022 1:49 pm

I thought the obvious gag was to have the first cutaway of the episode just last the whole episode. Surprised they haven’t pulled that one.

Legion pulled something similar in the second season, have the pre-credits opener go on for so long that it became the whole episode, with the title card and opening credits not showing up until the episode was over.

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: The Simpsons

#980 Post by colinr0380 » Fri Jul 01, 2022 2:04 pm

The closest Family Guy has come to being that experimental that comes to mind is the locked in a vault episode, which felt just as notable for not having any score!

User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am

Re: The Simpsons

#981 Post by Drucker » Fri Jul 01, 2022 3:18 pm

Season 3 is probably my favorite, Knives, and I do hope you make it to 3, 4, and 5 and don't judge the show too harshly on the first two (though I do enjoy those). Saturdays Of Thunder has always been one of my favorite episodes and is the one that does a superb job of, well, just about everything good that the show does.

beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm

Re: The Simpsons

#982 Post by beamish14 » Fri Jul 01, 2022 4:05 pm

The mixture of pathos and humor was really more deftly balanced when Sam Simon was running the show, and it reached its apex during seasons 3 and 4. I certainly think the first 9 seasons are all worth watching and hold up to repeat viewings. It was by the early 2000's, and episodes like "Bart to the Future" in particular,that the show became unbearable. All of the A-list writers/producers exited by that point (with many of them flailing with their own shows* or films). Even Groening's own once-brilliant Life in Hell quietly died, but not before becoming deeply repetitive as well.

In essence, The Simpsons will always be a product of the 90's and the unique ethos, aesthetics, and Western popular culture that sprang from that era, and it seems anachronistic today.

*Mission Hill and The Critic are excellent

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: The Simpsons

#983 Post by hearthesilence » Fri Jul 01, 2022 10:18 pm

There's probably several good articles on this out there, but I always wondered what Sam Simon did compared to the other two executive producers Groening and Brooks, and given his absence in the DVD commentaries, I kind of pictured him having a lesser role than the other two. Turns out, he really was THE guy who IMHO made the show that had its devoted following rather than a large mass of casual viewers. This may be overgeneralizing it, but after some turnover and reshuffling, he basically guided the second creative team that ran the show, and he clearly set the tone of "let's just try to make the best show we can do, and the kind of show we WANT to do, and not worry about anything else." To be fair, I have some reservations that apply to his seasons as well (as posted upthread), but seasons 3 & 4 had the bulk of my favorite episodes and probably got a lot more play than any other DVD set. It's just really unfortunate that he had a very bitter falling out with the other executive producers, though the crazy deal to get rid of him still made him an extremely wealthy man without ever having to do another thing. IIRC he was banking $20-30 million a year up to the day he died, which unfortunately was way too early (age 59), but he gave most of that away to good causes.

beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm

Re: The Simpsons

#984 Post by beamish14 » Fri Jul 01, 2022 11:41 pm

hearthesilence wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 10:18 pm
There's probably several good articles on this out there, but I always wondered what Sam Simon did compared to the other two executive producers Groening and Brooks, and given his absence in the DVD commentaries, I kind of pictured him having a lesser role than the other two. Turns out, he really was THE guy who IMHO made the show that had its devoted following rather than a large mass of casual viewers. This may be overgeneralizing it, but after some turnover and reshuffling, he basically guided the second creative team that ran the show, and he clearly set the tone of "let's just try to make the best show we can do, and the kind of show we WANT to do, and not worry about anything else." To be fair, I have some reservations that apply to his seasons as well (as posted upthread), but seasons 3 & 4 had the bulk of my favorite episodes and probably got a lot more play than any other DVD set. It's just really unfortunate that he had a very bitter falling out with the other executive producers, though the crazy deal to get rid of him still made him an extremely wealthy man without ever having to do another thing. IIRC he was banking $20-30 million a year up to the day he died, which unfortunately was way too early (age 59), but he gave most of that away to good causes.
Simon didn’t just guide the show’s evolution and hand-pick many of the first generation writing staff; in tandem with David Silverman, he revised Groening’s character designs and made them far more palatable than they appeared on Tracy Ullman. Simon was a cartoonist for Stanford University’s student paper and had a very strong visual sense.

Unfortunately, he also discriminated against female writers, as he wouldn’t let Mimi Pond, who wrote “Simpsons Roasting on an Open Fire”, be a permanent staff member

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: The Simpsons

#985 Post by hearthesilence » Fri Jul 01, 2022 11:59 pm

beamish14 wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 11:41 pm
Unfortunately, he also discriminated against female writers, as he wouldn’t let Mimi Pond, who wrote “Simpsons Roasting on an Open Fire”, be a permanent staff member
Eeeeep....the blatant misogyny in the comedy world is so disheartening. Didn't Janeane Garofalo say she quit the cast of SNL for similar reasons, albeit in a reverse relationship? (I think one writer actually said to her face that he refused to write jokes for women, using a derogatory term in the process.)

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Simpsons

#986 Post by domino harvey » Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:27 am

Jennifer Crittenden was on staff in later part of the good years. She in fact wrote the “Do it for her” episode mentioned upthread

User avatar
DarkImbecile
Ask me about my visible cat breasts
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:24 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: The Simpsons

#987 Post by DarkImbecile » Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:11 pm


User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

Future Simpsons

#988 Post by Lemmy Caution » Thu Sep 01, 2022 3:12 pm

Recently I've watched almost a dozen later Simpsons episodes from Seasons 23-28, plus the 2 Horror episodes from S31. Rather disappointing overall. Occasionally a good joke pops up. And a few episodes have promising ideas and starts, only to collapse.

The only one that stood out is S23 E09 Future Xmas. The Simpsons have always done a good job delving into their future (and past). There's a lot of good ideas, jokes that work, and a bit of a message that comes through. I liked Bart's kids and his fraught relationship with them. And small touches, like Bart living in the school (and grinding his coffee beans in the pencil sharpener).

Too many of the other later episodes get frantic, and try too hard to be edgy. I was also surprised by the level of violence, but maybe that's because 4 that I watched were the Horror episodes. But the violence was more graphic than I expected.

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: The Simpsons

#989 Post by hearthesilence » Thu Sep 01, 2022 3:41 pm



User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Simpsons

#991 Post by domino harvey » Sat Dec 10, 2022 7:37 pm


User avatar
mizo
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:22 pm
Location: Heard about Pittsburgh PA?

Re: The Simpsons

#992 Post by mizo » Mon Dec 12, 2022 6:59 pm


flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: The Simpsons

#993 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Mon Dec 19, 2022 1:48 am

Sideshow Bob watching MacGuyver with Patty and Selma has been all of us at some point. Not just romantic relationships but I think with all loved ones some of us should be judged at how much junk tv we can handle before resorting to slurs such as claptrap.


beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm

Re: The Simpsons

#995 Post by beamish14 » Wed Jul 10, 2024 1:43 pm

Love those guys. DJ Muggs is one of the greatest producers ever. B-Real has a marijuana dispensary franchise now

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Simpsons

#996 Post by domino harvey » Sat Oct 26, 2024 1:39 pm

Image

beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm

Re: The Simpsons

#997 Post by beamish14 » Sat Oct 26, 2024 3:14 pm

domino harvey wrote:
Sat Oct 26, 2024 1:39 pm
Image



Already have the Adidas shoes AND socks that immortalize this

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: The Simpsons

#998 Post by colinr0380 » Sun Oct 27, 2024 10:06 am

Has there been any sign of the post-Season 20 series turning up on physical media at all?

Post Reply