Film Criticism

A subforum to discuss film culture and criticism.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
DarkImbecile
Ask me about my visible cat breasts
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:24 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Film Criticism

#1001 Post by DarkImbecile » Fri Aug 10, 2018 11:25 pm


User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: Film Criticism

#1002 Post by mfunk9786 » Sat Aug 11, 2018 1:04 am

"Deskmate" is grim. I've been entirely too spoiled by having my own office for 5+ years and at least my own cubicle for my entire professional career, I certainly can't imagine sharing a desk with someone. White collar humblebrag, etc

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Film Criticism

#1003 Post by hearthesilence » Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:33 pm

Pretty dire. Remember when their former staff went off and formed the Dissolve, which didn't last very long? What seemed like a risk now comes off as a no-loss gambit. It wasn't easy making a living in criticism before, but Jesus...

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Film Criticism

#1004 Post by domino harvey » Sat Aug 11, 2018 1:20 pm

Blame amateur writers willing to undercut acceptable rates for articles. I've already seen this with editing for some time, which is impossible to make any money doing unless you already have a connection willing to pay you above the ludicrous market rate

User avatar
dadaistnun
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:31 am

Re: Film Criticism

#1005 Post by dadaistnun » Fri Aug 31, 2018 2:15 pm


User avatar
bearcuborg
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:30 am
Location: Philadelphia via Chicago

Re: Film Criticism

#1006 Post by bearcuborg » Sat Sep 01, 2018 6:59 pm

dadaistnun wrote:
Fri Aug 31, 2018 2:15 pm
R.I.P the Village Voice.
I would have thought this would have gotten more play here, considering this was so vital for keeping up with all NY had to offer. Much like my hometown Chicago Reader, this was probably a bit more crucial when J. Hoberman was still there, just as it was when Rosenbaum still wrote for the Reader.

Some of our older members may remember when this thing was 11x17! I don’t, but I’ve seen older copies in book stores.


User avatar
diamonds
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:35 pm

Re: Film Criticism

#1008 Post by diamonds » Sun Nov 11, 2018 3:56 pm

Three volume collection of André Bazin's complete writings released this week. Press kit here. How I wish I knew French.

User avatar
BenoitRouilly
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 5:49 pm

Re: Film Criticism

#1009 Post by BenoitRouilly » Sun Nov 11, 2018 4:56 pm

10 years in the making... They (Hervé Joubert-Laurencin, Cahiers and the Bazin estate) talk about publishing a complete oeuvre of Bazin since at least 2008 (see my blog)
And David Bordwell has a post on his blog about this release.
Finally access to the full version of Qu'est-ce que le cinéma ? / What is Cinema? originally in 3 volumes in 1958 (out of print), and abridged in 1 volume since 1985...

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Film Criticism

#1010 Post by colinr0380 » Thu Dec 13, 2018 5:18 pm

Slightly worryingly this month's edition of Sight & Sound (the one with the films of the year poll in it) is a larger than normal issue but comprises January and February editions of the magazine, with the next (March) edition being out on 4th February. Nick James in his editorial talks of it being "designed for the holiday period" and "largest issue ever produced in response to a complex year that's ending on a high note for films", yet signs off with a pleas for spreading the word about the magazine to attract more subscribers, which is slightly concerning!

(I have to say though that I do like the weighty feel to the larger magazine! 146 pages compared to the usual monthly 96. Though by the same measure that does not exactly equate to two entire separate issues worth of content)

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Film Criticism

#1011 Post by hearthesilence » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:07 pm

I imagine the situation is similar in the UK, but in the US, not only has film criticism been decimated, but magazine publishing in general has been bleeding a slow death. I have quite a few classmates who work as reporters or editors here in NY (most people who want to break into magazines gravitate towards NYC), and it's been a rough decade to say the least. I'm not sure what the business model would be like for a British publication - for example, the number of physical newspapers read by the public there is certainly a lot higher than it is here in the US. And I'm not sure what it would be for a publication that doesn't cater to a general audience either. But it wouldn't surprise me if somewhere down the road they decide an all-digital publication is the best chance for longtime survival. Maybe not soon, but that seems to be the trajectory for most magazines.

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Film Criticism

#1012 Post by colinr0380 » Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:39 pm

It does seem that this is a factor as Nick James also says:
Nick James in Sight & Sound editorial wrote:Sight & Sound, like all publications, is trading in what the Guardian has called "an incredibly challenging commercial environment". Having a great double issue like this delivers a better, more comprehensive magazine while saving costs.
Plus Mark Cousins is stepping down from his column:
Mark Cousins wrote:This will be my last regular piece in S&S. Why? Here are three explanations. I had a big argument with the editor, Nick James, and he sacked me. I have been asking for some time to be sacked, because no one should have a writing job this long. Sight & Sound is changing and I am the old guard. Choose which you prefer.

User avatar
Oedipax
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:48 am
Location: Atlanta

Re: Film Criticism

#1013 Post by Oedipax » Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:13 pm

BenoitRouilly wrote:
Sun Nov 11, 2018 4:56 pm
10 years in the making... They (Hervé Joubert-Laurencin, Cahiers and the Bazin estate) talk about publishing a complete oeuvre of Bazin since at least 2008 (see my blog)
And David Bordwell has a post on his blog about this release.
Finally access to the full version of Qu'est-ce que le cinéma ? / What is Cinema? originally in 3 volumes in 1958 (out of print), and abridged in 1 volume since 1985...
Just in case anyone else, like me, clicked on Bordwell's Amazon fr link and was struck by severe sticker shock (a third-party seller asking nearly €500 with shipping fees), you can get it direct from Éditions Macula for €149. I may or may not have just ordered... :-$


User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Film Criticism

#1015 Post by domino harvey » Sun Dec 16, 2018 6:10 pm

Will release, I believe. This and the Godard book have been licensed from Caboose for US release in April (and the price went up threefold)

User avatar
BenoitRouilly
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 5:49 pm

Re: Film Criticism

#1016 Post by BenoitRouilly » Mon Dec 17, 2018 5:27 pm

20 years in the making actually. Hervé Joubert-Laurencin was interviewed this weekend on the weekly French radio show "Plan large" (for the francophones). Pretty interesting conversation with him and Charlotte Garson and Alain Guillot.
And if it wasn't as steep as €149... I would offer myself this Xmas gift.

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Film Criticism

#1017 Post by colinr0380 » Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:11 am

The BBC has confirmed they are ending their film review show on BBC1, which has run in some form since 1971 but disappeared for most of last year. Peter Bradshaw commemorates it, while there is assurances that there will be something 'more suitable' to replace it. For what its worth Mark Kemode has today ended his decade long video blog series in slightly suspicious timing!

User avatar
thirtyframesasecond
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:48 pm

Re: Film Criticism

#1018 Post by thirtyframesasecond » Fri Dec 28, 2018 1:09 pm

colinr0380 wrote:
Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:11 am
The BBC has confirmed they are ending their film review show on BBC1, which has run in some form since 1971 but disappeared for most of last year. Peter Bradshaw commemorates it, while there is assurances that there will be something 'more suitable' to replace it. For what its worth Mark Kemode has today ended his decade long video blog series in slightly suspicious timing!
I didn't even realise that Winkleman had left two years ago! I stopped watching it when Norman left - I don't really like Ross or Winkleman and felt it tried too many things to jazz the programme up when the Norman template was successful as it was. The BBC ditched the cultural slot after Friday's Newsnight as well, right? I assume they feel there is no appetite for cultural stuff to a mainstream audience. Does Talking Pictures still exist? I quite liked that.

User avatar
DarkImbecile
Ask me about my visible cat breasts
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:24 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Film Criticism

#1019 Post by DarkImbecile » Mon Jan 28, 2019 4:18 pm

David Bordwell’s latest post gets into his spat with Jonathan Rosenbaum and diagnoses a strand of criticism as “militant cinephilia”.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Film Criticism

#1020 Post by domino harvey » Mon Jan 28, 2019 4:21 pm

As documented further in this thread a few pages back here

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Film Criticism

#1021 Post by domino harvey » Mon Jan 28, 2019 4:31 pm

Also, having now read his entire post, Bordwell is too pure for our world. Only Bordwell could make calling out another critic feel like a zen action of supreme confidence

User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: Film Criticism

#1022 Post by Big Ben » Mon Jan 28, 2019 4:38 pm

I'm only familiar with Rosenbaum on a topical level but he strikes me as being entirely unprofessional here. Has always been so abrasive?

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Film Criticism

#1023 Post by domino harvey » Mon Jan 28, 2019 4:46 pm

He's always been like this, and has a history of silly remarks (especially on the relative worth of many films) that people on this forum ignore because he likes a lot of the same movies many of us do. I'll double down on what I said earlier: he's just an Armond White with opinions many of the posters on this forum agree with

User avatar
BenoitRouilly
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2018 5:49 pm

Re: Film Criticism

#1024 Post by BenoitRouilly » Mon Jan 28, 2019 5:06 pm

In 2007 Rosenbaum mocked Bergman on his death bed, in a NYT OpEd, right before his retirement. Bordwell and others called his bluff (my account of the story here). And his reaction was to refuse to read Bordwell's article. Turtling up. A critic who is afraid of criticism when it goes against him. It's not professionnal and discredits his right to criticize others' work if his own is above criticism. Rosenbaum has a fine taste and a record of quality reviews, but sometimes he can say the darnest things...
[EDIT] This said, I have to agree that Kubrick is leagues above Nolan (at this point of his career).

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: Film Criticism

#1025 Post by Michael Kerpan » Mon Jan 28, 2019 8:11 pm

I love David Bordwell -- not infallible, sure, but decent and thoughtful and interesting.

Post Reply