It is currently Tue Apr 24, 2018 7:02 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 8:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 5:04 pm
Location: Hants, UK
Looking pretty solid to me: http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film3/dvd_revi ... lu-ray.htm


Top
 Profile  
 

 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 9:10 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Looks great! Can't wait to have my pre-order cancelled


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 9:36 pm 
Dot Com Dom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Don't worry, you can just pick up any of the countless other films that play the same notes of "It was all a dream/hallucination... or was it?!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 12:18 am 

Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:10 pm
Those screenshots sold me! Looks excellent!
(though I imagine many complaints about that heavy grain in some shots.. hehe)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 1:16 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT
mfunk9786 wrote:
Looks great! Can't wait to have my pre-order cancelled

Be fair, this isn't a limited edition. The joke should be about the replacement discs never being distributed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:54 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
gap wrote:
Tenia, where do you post your reviews?

French website http://www.retro-hd.com.
Though it has been 2 rather slow months lately for me, for various personal reasons.

swo17 wrote:
mfunk9786 wrote:
Looks great! Can't wait to have my pre-order cancelled

Be fair, this isn't a limited edition. The joke should be about the replacement discs never being distributed.

Pretty much. Though obviously, I suppose LEs can also get replacement discs never being distributed. \:D/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:41 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:22 am
domino harvey wrote:
Don't worry, you can just pick up any of the countless other films that play the same notes of "It was all a dream/hallucination... or was it?!"

But how many of those films contain snippets of their lead actresses's unpublished story about unicorns?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:43 pm 
Dot Com Dom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
As Waylon Smithers once said, even one is too many


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 12:52 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
Shrew wrote:
But how many of those films contain snippets of their lead actresses's unpublished story about unicorns?

You probably know this, but just for the record, Hodder & Stoughton eventually published Susannah York's In Search of Unicorns, a few months after the film's release. Oddly enough, one of my earliest memories is my sister reading a borrowed copy to me not long thereafter, so it must have made some impression.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 6:03 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
I remember that too - and I’d have been just the right age (five or six, with younger siblings). In fact, I knew Susannah York as a writer long before I ever realised she had a more famous parallel career.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 8:48 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:30 am
Location: Philadelphia via Chicago
At five you were long aware of the author of a couple minor kids books?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:24 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
bearcuborg wrote:
At five you were long aware of the author of a couple minor kids books?

I'm genuinely startled that you interpreted my post like that, as I thought I was being perfectly clear - but in case anyone else is confused, I was saying that I only found out that she was an actress many, many years (as in teens minimum) after I became aware that she was an author.

Which has tangentially reminded me of that wonderful Geoff Brown article 'Preston Sturges: Inventor' that I reproduced in Arrow's Sullivan's Travels booklet, the angle being that it was a biography of Sturges as though he was an inventor first and foremost who just happened to briefly dabble in film in the 1940s. Similarly, there are scientists for whom Alexander Borodin is much more famous as a great nineteenth-century analytical chemist - the music stuff was merely a hobby.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2018 11:08 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:01 pm
Location: WellyYeller
I have just viewed this through twice very careully, initially wiht a 4k uprez and then straight Rec.709 color spacing and absolutely no digital tweaks. I find it extremely hard to believe the encode or 4K was sourced from an O-Neg. The grain is almost totally unmanagable and that's even in highly lit studio material like the opening and closing white apartmrnt sequences which are clearly studio sets. There is a detectable - no a massive increase in grain management, clarity and resolution/sharpness in the last reel/ten minutes. Which makes the preceding 90 minutes seem all the more puzzling. quality wise.

This is to say nothing negative about Arrow's technical handling of the material. But I simply cannot believe how variable this is. And I'm fully aware Zgismond shot with a range of Panavision primes in multiple light and speed conditions. I have seen it theatrically literally forty plus years ago but memory is hopelessly unreliable for that, although I remember not liking the film then and thinking it looked "dark". I love the film now with one small reservation about a love scene at the one hour mark which is overtly expository and against the rest of the picture's ambivalent realities. Anyway a friend was going to ask Grover Crisp about the source.

Needless to say kudos to Arrow for getting it out, it's been virtually mising in action since '72, and I consider it a major Altman.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 1:41 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
The booklet states : "there are a couple of instances in which next gen dupe materials were inserted into the cut negative. At these points the quality of the image is reduced and the film grain is elevated to a noticeable level,, but we have attempted to make these shots fit in with the surrounding footage as closely as possible."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 5:18 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:01 pm
Location: WellyYeller
I am seeing many, many more than a couple of shots with this issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2018 4:14 am 

Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 3:43 am
Overall very, very good transfer of a great film. Better than good transfers 3 Women (Arrow and Criterion), That Cold Day in the Park (Eureka); as good as Long Goodbye (Arrow); not quite up there with Short Cuts, The Player, McCabe & Nashville - releases that surely had a way bigger Blu ray production budget.

Maybe there is some variation if they had to use different elements but is it as distracting as having ten minutes of what appears SD, or at the very least an old film print, in the middle of “5 star” restorations like Anatomy of a Murder (Criterion) and Women in Love (BFI and presumably Criterion) (Two restos I mostly greatly admire, to be clear.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2018 4:20 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:01 pm
Location: WellyYeller
THe movie was originally distributed by Columbia/now Sony who had no production interest in it so they have never been responsible for "conservation". It presumably drifted into and out of various studio vaults via MGM ending up as a UA property for most of its life. What is odd here is the condition of the negative compared to McCabe and Mrs Miller. Back when that was first released it often projected to look like murky shit. The new 4K of McCabe is the best I have ever seen it and a good home projection system will play it back with premium quality. Things was here Altman and DP Zsigmond were at their stoned peak "let's fool around with the negative" period, and a lot fo the footgae was flashed before exposure, then a lot of the film was shot with minimal light, like candles etc. Images looks similarly shot with low light natural light source but the outcomes are different, the daytime wides (telephotos) are some of the worst images in it for blown out grain, and the dark low light sequences some of the best. It's simply the elements Arrow had to use. Arrow has given it a very high bitrate and maintained total consistency in both grain, rez and color timing. THeir own work can't be faulted.

And I go to pains to insist it's aboslutely worth buying. It's basically been unseen since the early seventies and contrary to some opinions here I consider it a major Altman.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Images
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2018 8:10 am 

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:00 am
david hare wrote:
And I go to pains to insist it's aboslutely worth buying. It's basically been unseen since the early seventies and contrary to some opinions here I consider it a major Altman.
I agree with the last comment. To my taste it's easily Altman's masterpiece. I don't know why you say it's been unseen since the early seventies though. It's been available on DVD for years.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection