The Future of Home Video
- movielocke
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:44 am
The Future of Home Video
It is worth remembering that VHS was popular not just because you could use it to rent or own movies. People did do both, and loved it for that.
But our families, and millions of other families, VCR was dedicated to recording tv and time shifting when we watched something.
We didn't record everything, it was still fairly selective, often special events and sometimes the weekly shows we didn't want to miss, and we recorded movies fairly regularly, often more often than we rented--recorded off hbo return of the Jedi and empire strikes back, or recorded off Disney channel Swiss family Robinson or old yeller spring immediately to mind. And we had all the Christmas classics recorded off broadcasts (watching the eighties commercials in the nineties was half the fun!)
When DVRs became a standard part of every cable and satellite package I think that is a crucial tipping point to DVD finally beating VHS as a format. because once they had DVRs people were more willing to give up the superior VCR feature sets (recording) for a "lesser" new format that was playback only. It was sort of the "iPhone" of its day, pay more for less features but SHINY!
But our families, and millions of other families, VCR was dedicated to recording tv and time shifting when we watched something.
We didn't record everything, it was still fairly selective, often special events and sometimes the weekly shows we didn't want to miss, and we recorded movies fairly regularly, often more often than we rented--recorded off hbo return of the Jedi and empire strikes back, or recorded off Disney channel Swiss family Robinson or old yeller spring immediately to mind. And we had all the Christmas classics recorded off broadcasts (watching the eighties commercials in the nineties was half the fun!)
When DVRs became a standard part of every cable and satellite package I think that is a crucial tipping point to DVD finally beating VHS as a format. because once they had DVRs people were more willing to give up the superior VCR feature sets (recording) for a "lesser" new format that was playback only. It was sort of the "iPhone" of its day, pay more for less features but SHINY!
Last edited by movielocke on Mon Nov 20, 2017 7:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: The Future of Home Video
It's intesting, because what I recall most DVD for was all the "Collector 2-DVD releases" that often included hours of in-depth extras and making of. Shooting diaries like Rob Zombie ones basically got born with the format, while it allowed people like Jérôme Wybon in France to go back in the archives and include stuff that wouldn't have been included otherwise, especially not on tape.McCrutchy wrote:It's sad that the most high-profile (if not profitable) era for home video was during its worst format. By the time DVD fully supplanted VHS around 2002-2003, DVD was already about box sets and seasons of TV shows and unending releases at relatively cheap prices. Content was already being drastically cheapened, and there was less and less time to revel in each individual title.
Sadly, later in the days, these "2-DVD releases" ended up being overdone, with many releases just throwing an extra disc with only a handful of short meaningless PR extras just to make you pay a bit more (Disney still does today with their 3-discs BR releases, where one of the disc only has 20 minutes of extras on it), but fortunately, independant labels got this then, and still now.
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: The Future of Home Video
You're right but thankfully the current film restoration renaissance is happening during the bluray era. (Or is it thanks to the bluray)McCrutchy wrote: It's sad that the most high-profile (if not profitable) era for home video was during its worst format.
I'd like to raise a glass to Mr Redman and his proclamation of doom being a total bust.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: The Future of Home Video
I've never produced a barebones disc, and I've hardly ever produced one with no newly-commissioned content. And if the extras spill over onto a second disc, I don't think it's ever run less than two hours.tenia wrote:Sadly, later in the days, these "2-DVD releases" ended up being overdone, with many releases just throwing an extra disc with only a handful of short meaningless PR extras just to make you pay a bit more (Disney still does today with their 3-discs BR releases, where one of the disc only has 20 minutes of extras on it), but fortunately, independant labels got this then, and still now.
Although one major change over the last decade or so that's helped facilitate this is that it's much easier to create high-quality high-definition content on a very low budget. The first extras that I produced in 2006 involved hiring a small crew (cameraman, sound recordist, editor), but now the vast majority are one-man shows, which is much more work for me (understatement), but costs are far lower and I also relish the amount of control that I have - particularly at the editing stage, as I can tweak things for as long as I like (final deadline permitting) without worrying about running up a vast edit suite bill. I also generally do my own SDH subtitling, which also helps keep costs down as that can be a surprisingly hefty expense as well.
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Re: The Future of Home Video
That is one of the reasons I still have a wall of VHS tapes of things recorded over the 90s and 2000s before moving to DVD-Rs. I'd always agree in wanting to see films in the best possible quality and that DVD (and eventually Blu-ray) surprassed VHS in many ways, but I'd never get rid of my old library as in the very first instance I think it is important to have an opportunity to see a film at all, then after that basic is covered it is possible to be concerned about getting it in best quality after that. For something like Alien I probably don't need my VHS tape of at all any more now that I have it on both DVD and Blu-ray (though I have held onto my widescreen VHS tape of it for sentimental reasons mostly, it being a defining Christmas present that sort of gave me my parent's permission, as a normally rule-abiding 13 year old, permission to watch the 18-rated film, as well as go off on into the 'adult section' of cinema!), but for years my recorded-from-television VHS tape was the only way I had to watch The Devils, or until this year's Criterion release, The Lodger!movielocke wrote:It is worth remembering that VHS was popular not just because you could use it to rent or own movies. People did do both, and loved it for that.
But our families, and millions of other families, VCR was dedicated to recording tv and time shifting when we watched something.
Even now if I want to see the 'un-tinkered with by George Lucas to add extra unnecessary CGI' version of THX-1138, I have to go back to my 1995 recording of a TV broadcast of it!
-
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:57 am
- Location: East Coast, USA
Re: The Future of Home Video
Right, and that's what brought most of those releases down. After 2006, you could tell that the economic collapse and the need to focus on both the Blu-ray and HD DVD formats meant that truly comprehensive 2xDVD sets from Hollywood started to get poorer in quality. By 2008, I was into Blu-ray, and for a short and wonderful time, it was treated pretty well, but it was still very expensive to produce, so special editions were more or less limited to absolute prestige titles. Then we got a bunch of "advancements" like BD-Live, digital copies (on discs), and finally this slew of streaming services, which diverted time and money away from resuming quality Special Editions on Blu-ray, even as the cost of the format seemed to decrease, and boutique labels were becoming more prominent in the format.tenia wrote:It's intesting, because what I recall most DVD for was all the "Collector 2-DVD releases" that often included hours of in-depth extras and making of. Shooting diaries like Rob Zombie ones basically got born with the format, while it allowed people like Jérôme Wybon in France to go back in the archives and include stuff that wouldn't have been included otherwise, especially not on tape.
Sadly, later in the days, these "2-DVD releases" ended up being overdone, with many releases just throwing an extra disc with only a handful of short meaningless PR extras just to make you pay a bit more (Disney still does today with their 3-discs BR releases, where one of the disc only has 20 minutes of extras on it), but fortunately, independant labels got this then, and still now.
So, to me, what we have now is possibly akin to the early days of DVD, where DVD was seen by the public as an expensive format. However, in some sense, we have also resumed the ways of the Laserdisc, in that it is licensees and licensors who are driving catalog titles, while the studios focus almost entirely on new release films. However, Blu-ray certainly has way more general appeal than LDs ever did, and there is also the fact that for certain kinds of films and TV shows (HBO), Blu-ray is now seen as the "standard" format, something Laserdisc never achieved except perhaps in Japan. And it is telling, too, that Ultra HD Blu-ray, the "offspring" format of Blu-ray, has become a sort of new Laserdisc-level format already, and looks poised to grow beyond what Laserdisc did, as well.
- movielocke
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:44 am
Re: The Future of Home Video
For me I would say that consumers experienced "features fatigue" around 2006-2008. Where you knew how all of them were going to be and you just stopped caring entirely. At least from major studio releases. I remember I watched all the features on the first lord of the rings extended and I don't think I watched any on the third extended edition, for example.
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: The Future of Home Video
It's about right, but I don't think that's what DVD will be remembered for (down-ish releases), especially since the indies got it from there and indeed, the first BD releases weren't particularly feature loaded (but instance tried to push the stupid BD-Live feature that turned out to be pretty much DOA).movielocke wrote:For me I would say that consumers experienced "features fatigue" around 2006-2008. Where you knew how all of them were going to be and you just stopped caring entirely. At least from major studio releases. I remember I watched all the features on the first lord of the rings extended and I don't think I watched any on the third extended edition, for example.
But McCrutchy's right, we're probably back to Physical Video Bliss currently.
- TMDaines
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:01 pm
- Location: Stretford, Manchester
Re: The Future of Home Video
Have you got anything to back this up? I always saw Blu-ray as more niche in Germany than here.MichaelB wrote:Blu-ray has never been a huge commercial deal in the UK (certainly not compared with the US or Germany), but paradoxically it has one of the strongest boutique-label sectors.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: The Future of Home Video
Last time I checked, the top three Blu-ray markets in the world were the US, then Japan, then Germany.
- hearthesilence
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
- Location: NYC
Re: The Future of Home Video
Just out of curiosity, is that from sheer sales numbers, or is that based on proportional data (i.e. taking into account the size of the market/population)?
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: The Future of Home Video
I always assumed sales numbers.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: The Future of Home Video
Wow, no wonder so many movies get releases in Germany and nowhere else
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: The Future of Home Video
Yes, thanks for that - that was exactly the kind of thing I was looking for.
Germany overtook the UK five years ago and the gap has been widening ever since - I think we've adopted streaming services in rather greater numbers.
And the chart also explains why eastern European Blu-rays are (a) as rare as hen's teeth (especially local product), and (b) so much more expensive than their DVD equivalents that I often favour the latter.
Germany overtook the UK five years ago and the gap has been widening ever since - I think we've adopted streaming services in rather greater numbers.
And the chart also explains why eastern European Blu-rays are (a) as rare as hen's teeth (especially local product), and (b) so much more expensive than their DVD equivalents that I often favour the latter.
Re: The Future of Home Video
I couldn't find equivalent numbers for Japan, but Frozen sold about 2.3 million Blu-rays in 2014. The next highest seller was Puella Magi Madoka Magica: Rebellion with 154,000 sold.
Dentsu. Leading Blu-ray titles in Japan as of December 2014, by unit sales (in thousands). https://www.statista.com/statistics/688 ... nit-sales/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (accessed December 6, 2017).
Dentsu. Leading Blu-ray titles in Japan as of December 2014, by unit sales (in thousands). https://www.statista.com/statistics/688 ... nit-sales/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (accessed December 6, 2017).
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Re: The Future of Home Video
I think it is an absolute travesty that Germany has a Blu-ray release of Bone Alone and we have to make do with a DVD!domino harvey wrote:Wow, no wonder so many movies get releases in Germany and nowhere else
(It was either that joke or something about the sheer number of Schoolgirl Report films)
Last edited by colinr0380 on Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- FrauBlucher
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
- Location: Greenwich Village
Re: The Future of Home Video
While bluray sales have gone up over the years, Dvd has gone down. Are we at the point where bluray is catching and passing dvd sales at least in the UK?Werewolf by Night wrote:Here's a couple more, why not:
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: The Future of Home Video
I feel like this is the wrong link, though perhaps Bone Alone's references to Home Alone are more esoteric than I realizedcolinr0380 wrote:I think it is an absolute travesty that Germany has a Blu-ray release of Bone Alone and we have to make do with a DVD!domino harvey wrote:Wow, no wonder so many movies get releases in Germany and nowhere else
(It was either that joke or something about the sheer number of Schoolgirl Report films)
Re: The Future of Home Video
It's hard to say from the data above (especially since the last year for the Blu-ray only sales figures is 2013), but I would think DVD is still outselling Blu-ray. In 2013, 119 million units of "film on video" were sold, only 18.8 million (15.79%) of them Blu-rays. It would have to be a wild jump in the last four years to see Blu-ray outsell DVD, and the slowing rate of growth of Blu-ray sales from 2010-2013 doesn't seem to indicate a jump of that order in 2013-2016.FrauBlucher wrote:While bluray sales have gone up over the years, Dvd has gone down. Are we at the point where bluray is catching and passing dvd sales at least in the UK?
- Big Ben
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
- Location: Great Falls, Montana
Re: The Future of Home Video
Devastated to hear you aren't a fan of The Evil Within 2.domino harvey wrote: I feel like this is the wrong link, though perhaps Bone Alone's references to Home Alone are more esoteric than I realized
Does anyone know specifically why Germany is such a huge buyer?
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Re: The Future of Home Video
Whoops! Fixed the link now!
- GaryC
- Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 3:56 pm
- Location: Aldershot, Hampshire, UK
Re: The Future of Home Video
I had a quick look for Australia, and the most recent figures I could find (for 2016) said that Blu-rays made up about 19% of the disc market, which probably explains why quite a number of new films are getting DVD-only releases. There are also streaming services, but it seems that Australians prefer to buy rather than rent their films digitally. Here and here.MichaelB wrote:And the chart also explains why eastern European Blu-rays are (a) as rare as hen's teeth (especially local product), and (b) so much more expensive than their DVD equivalents that I often favour the latter.
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: The Future of Home Video
That's the true question. I wonder if they were historically already huge DVD buyers. It might be a historical trend.Big Ben wrote:Does anyone know specifically why Germany is such a huge buyer?
In France, it still vastly is the case, with DVD sales being 4.7 times higher than BD sales in volume, and 2.7 times in value (based on Jan-Sept 2017).Werewolf by Night wrote:It's hard to say from the data above (especially since the last year for the Blu-ray only sales figures is 2013), but I would think DVD is still outselling Blu-ray.
In 2015, it was a 5.5 ratio in volume / 3.1 in value, in 2013 6.8 / 3.5. You can see how it's closing in, but both markets are dropping (-14% for DVD YtY and -6.4% YtY for BD) so the intensity of the drops themselves will also impact how fast (or if at all) BD end up outselling DVD. I suppose that the longest it take, the most likely BD sales are likely to drop more and more each year.