331 Late Spring

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
eerik
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:53 pm
Location: Estonia

Re: 331 Late Spring

#201 Post by eerik » Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:24 pm

Blu-ray announced for April 17th 2012.

User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: 331 Late Spring

#202 Post by Tom Hagen » Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:44 pm

Really hope this wasn't the only reason Win Wenders was loitering in their closet.

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: 331 Late Spring

#203 Post by Michael Kerpan » Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:17 pm

I hope they have a more impressive transfer than the BFI one.

User avatar
eerik
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:53 pm
Location: Estonia

Re: 331 Late Spring

#204 Post by eerik » Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:18 am

Michael Kerpan wrote:I hope they have a more impressive transfer than the BFI one.
BFI used Criterion's transfer if I remember correctly.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 331 Late Spring

#205 Post by MichaelB » Sat Jan 14, 2012 6:32 am

Yes, unless Criterion did a new one in the interim it'll be exactly the same.

As far as I recall, the BFI used Criterion's transfers for all their Ozu BDs apart from Good Morning, where the shortcomings of the Criterion transfer were so notorious that they commissioned a new one.

User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: 331 Late Spring

#206 Post by Gregory » Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:35 pm

But the BFI "work on" the Criterion transfers for their Ozu releases at least in some cases, right? This DigitalFix review claims that the BFI boosted contrast slightly on the Late Spring transfer and completed "further picture and audio restoration." Granted, differences between the two, if there are any, are likely to be very slight.

I already have the Criterion DVDs of Late Spring and The Only Son and am having a hard time deciding whether it's worth it to buy the region B set for what look to be minimal improvements on The Only Son (which had to be sourced from a battered 16mm master) or just buy the Criterion Late Spring blu when it comes out.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 331 Late Spring

#207 Post by MichaelB » Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:34 pm

Gregory wrote:But the BFI "work on" the Criterion transfers for their Ozu releases at least in some cases, right? This DigitalFix review claims that the BFI boosted contrast slightly on the Late Spring transfer and completed "further picture and audio restoration." Granted, differences between the two, if there are any, are likely to be very slight.
As with Red Desert and The Leopard, Criterion and the BFI do their own grading and sometimes apply their own digital restoration, but given the common print and telecine source the similarities are likely to be more marked than the differences.

If I remember rightly from a chat with the Ozu series' first technical supervisor, the BFI's policy was to keep digital clean-up to a minimum: you're never going to get pristine copies of some of these titles, and trying to create one artificially is fraught with all sorts of ethical pitfalls.

User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: 331 Late Spring

#208 Post by manicsounds » Sat Jan 14, 2012 6:39 pm

Really didn't expect this one to come out, I would have expected Shochiku to release their own Blu-ray before any news of a US release. It also seems like an interesting choice for a Hidef release, knowing the condition of the print used on the DVD release.

artfilmfan
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:11 pm

Re: 331 Late Spring

#209 Post by artfilmfan » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:22 am

IMHO, Late Spring is Ozu's best and most perfect film. Therefore, it makes sense to be chosen as their first Ozu Blu-ray. For those who are new to Ozu, if they get hooked by Late Spring, they will seek out more of his films.

This is our last chance for getting a good English-friendly release of this wonderful film (one of the best films ever made). I hope Criterion will reduce the brightness to make the picture look more pleasing. Their DVD and the BFI releases look awful (over-exposed) in some of the scenes (as an example, see screen capture #3 at DVDBeaver). I hope Criterion reads this.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 331 Late Spring

#210 Post by MichaelB » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:31 am

MichaelB wrote:If I remember rightly from a chat with the Ozu series' first technical supervisor, the BFI's policy was to keep digital clean-up to a minimum: you're never going to get pristine copies of some of these titles, and trying to create one artificially is fraught with all sorts of ethical pitfalls.
To update my own post, I've since had another chat and this is the position.

The BFI used the following masters from Criterion: An Autumn Afternoon, Early Summer, Equinox Flower, Late Spring, The Only Son, There Was A Father, Tokyo Story. Of these, the BFI did additional grading and cleanup on An Autumn Afternoon and Equinox Flower, but left the others alone - so you're seeing the Criterion HD masters exactly as supplied (after compression as a by-product of encoding).

Good Morning and Late Autumn were taken from new HD masters, created from materials supplied directly from Shochiku - and the SD-only titles also came direct from Shochiku.

In all cases, these were the highest quality masters available at the time - so whether Criterion's Late Spring Blu-ray differs significantly from the BFI equivalent will largely depend on whether they're happy with their existing master or whether they've created a new one in the two years since it was licensed. My former colleague reckons that it's probably more likely that they'll work from the existing HD master and possibly try to give it additional digital restoration work, because he's not aware of any 35mm materials of Late Spring in existence that are superior to the ones used to create the master in the first place.

Tokyo Story is a different matter, as it's undergone a new restoration since the BFI disc was released, and Criterion may well be waiting to see what that looks like - hence their decision to make the possibly less commercially attractive Late Spring their first Ozu Blu-ray.

User avatar
kinjitsu
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Uffa!

Re: 331 Late Spring

#211 Post by kinjitsu » Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:54 pm

DVDBeaver on the BD

User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: 331 Late Spring

#212 Post by aox » Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:46 pm

Excellent.

The CC and BFI are almost identical, but as the review states and the caps clearly show, the CC shows much less damage than the BFI.

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: 331 Late Spring

#213 Post by Michael Kerpan » Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:00 pm

I'd rarther have Only Son as an extra than Tokyo Ga. ;~}

Judging from the screen captures (risky, I know), it looks to me that CC's damage repair may have softened the image (example -- it is much easier to read the name on the beach underneath the Coca-Cola sign in the BFI capture). I'll trad e a little damage for a bit extra sharpness, but that's just me.

User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: 331 Late Spring

#214 Post by aox » Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:04 pm

That seems to me to be more of a contrast issue in that particular instance. But I may not have the best eyes.

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: 331 Late Spring

#215 Post by Michael Kerpan » Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:12 pm

In at least some respects (such as no contrast over-boosting), the original Shochiku DVD release still is probably best (save for only Japanese subtitles).

User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: 331 Late Spring

#216 Post by manicsounds » Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:31 pm

Although they fixed that vertical line, looks like the other screencaps have the same damage marks as before. I wonder what they did, if anything to the wavy whiteness (I don't know how to describe it well) during the last 20 minutes. Also, it isn't mentioned, but is Tokyo Ga also in 1080p?

User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:22 am
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: 331 Late Spring

#217 Post by CSM126 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:12 pm

I'd be surprised if it isn't at least 1080i.

JonasEB
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:02 am

Re: 331 Late Spring

#218 Post by JonasEB » Wed Apr 04, 2012 2:14 am

manicsounds wrote:Although they fixed that vertical line, looks like the other screencaps have the same damage marks as before. I wonder what they did, if anything to the wavy whiteness (I don't know how to describe it well) during the last 20 minutes. Also, it isn't mentioned, but is Tokyo Ga also in 1080p?
Yeah, other than the line in the bike ride sequence it looks like they simply filtered the image to make the damage less visible. The most revealing caps in the comparison are the Noh performers (their faces, and take a look at the guy on the far right - the pattern on his hat is far more distinct and visible in the BFI, it's just a blur on the Criterion) and the shots with bushes and trees in them. Damage like this isn't worth digitizing away when it softens the image.

The sharper BFI sells itself but a 1080p edition of The Only Son really is a far more valuable extra than the Wenders documentary.

User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: 331 Late Spring

#219 Post by manicsounds » Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:46 am


User avatar
perkizitore
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:29 pm
Location: OOP is the only answer

Re: 331 Late Spring

#220 Post by perkizitore » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:24 am

I already have Tokyo Ga from the R2 Wim Wenders doc set, so the commentary alone is not enough for me to double dip.

User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: 331 Late Spring

#221 Post by manicsounds » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:20 pm

perkizitore wrote:I already have Tokyo Ga from the R2 Wim Wenders doc set, so the commentary alone is not enough for me to double dip.
To make you feel like you're missing out some more, the US R1 Wim Wenders Anchor Bay boxset has a Wim Wenders commentary track (over his 'original' narration)

User avatar
perkizitore
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:29 pm
Location: OOP is the only answer

Re: 331 Late Spring

#222 Post by perkizitore » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:36 pm

Still, two commentaries< The Only Son in 1080p

User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am

Re: 331 Late Spring

#223 Post by Drucker » Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:23 pm

I saw this film in a print today as 3-weeks of Ozu kicked off at Film Forum. Before today, I'd only seen Tokyo Story (four years ago) and Early Summer. I re-read this thread just now, and have to agree that the films were enjoyable with one viewing, but there is certainly much I must've missed by not having given them a second chance.

Late Spring on the other hand hit me very hard, today. The nuance of the film was often hard to detect, and I found myself missing things even in a theatrical setting. I think what might have helped though is the relatively smaller cast of characters and plot compared to the other two films. In Tokyo Story, there are three generations of stories happening. Here, the interaction focuses on two characters primarily, and while there might be some details of the divorced friend or the aunt that I missed, it didn't seem to impair my following, and thus enjoying the story.

my kevyip is about 30 films strong, and i need to plough through a ton of films on my DVR before I move this month and lose them all as I lose my cable box, but I suspect before long I will be charting down the path of Ozu in earnest and going through his films. I can't wait.

I would like to leave one note however, about the look of the film. Certainly it was a beat-up and old print, but I didn't think it was as comically rough as the one described on this board that was screened of Testament of Dr. Mabuse at Film Forum last quarter. Truth be told, the screenshots of the blu and DVD really do appear to look like what I saw today. There are some really, surprisingly dark scenes. The wedding scene features an incredibly bright white dress, honestly. As I've said before I'm not a technical whiz at all and hardly notice many of the technical grievances aired on this board, but I would honestly say what I see on DVDbeaver/bluray.com screenshots reflects what I saw today.

User avatar
teddyleevin
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:25 pm
Location: New York City
Contact:

Re: 331 Late Spring

#224 Post by teddyleevin » Wed Jun 19, 2013 4:31 pm

Drucker wrote: I would like to leave one note however, about the look of the film. Certainly it was a beat-up and old print, but I didn't think it was as comically rough as the one described on this board that was screened of Testament of Dr. Mabuse at Film Forum last quarter.
Ah, yes. That was my "comically rough" description. I didn't get to catch Late Spring, but I did see Early Spring last night. It was a Janus print, far afield from the rustic print with the British advisory warning at the beginning of Film Forum's Mabuse. The print for Early was beat-up and obviously very old (exactly as you describe yours), with the most obtrusive damage (visual and aural) happening in the final yards of the final reel, (the reel changes were intermittently messy, but not appalling). I'm sure a more well known film like Late would probably have had a better print.

Like the Mabuse, there were parts left unsubtitled, mostly greetings and affirmations, but occasionally more-than-brief responses that left me in the dark. Was this the case with the Late Spring print? (And are these the translations on the Criterion releases? Don't have my Eclipse set on me to compare, but the CriterionCast review of Early Spring quotes lines I remember from last night). Will try to hit up a few more of these screenings before the run ends, but interested to see the scope of the quality in prints for this retrospective. They probably got a good package deal out of getting so many films from the same distributors. Certainly far better than their 1933 retrospective, which must have been a headache to program and acquire for given the diversity and age.

As far as representation and accuracy go, the B&W prints are, based on your our testimonies, perfect representationally. I didn't get to see any of the color films, which are known for their debates on color accuracy on DVD, so it will be interesting to get a compare and contrast on those, as well.

User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am

Re: 331 Late Spring

#225 Post by Drucker » Wed Jun 19, 2013 4:35 pm

teddyleevin wrote:
Drucker wrote: I would like to leave one note however, about the look of the film. Certainly it was a beat-up and old print, but I didn't think it was as comically rough as the one described on this board that was screened of Testament of Dr. Mabuse at Film Forum last quarter.
Ah, yes. That was my "comically rough" description. I didn't get to catch Late Spring, but I did see Early Spring last night. It was a Janus print, far afield from the rustic print with the British advisory warning at the beginning of Film Forum's Mabuse. The print for Early was beat-up and obviously very old (exactly as you describe yours), with the most obtrusive damage (visual and aural) happening in the final yards of the final reel, (the reel changes were intermittently messy, but not appalling). I'm sure a more well known film like Late would probably have had a better print.

Like the Mabuse, there were parts left unsubtitled, mostly greetings and affirmations, but occasionally more-than-brief responses that left me in the dark. Was this the case with the Late Spring print? (And are these the translations on the Criterion releases? Don't have my Eclipse set on me to compare, but the CriterionCast review of Early Spring quotes lines I remember from last night). Will try to hit up a few more of these screenings before the run ends, but interested to see the scope of the quality in prints for this retrospective. They probably got a good package deal out of getting so many films from the same distributors. Certainly far better than their 1933 retrospective, which must have been a headache to program and acquire for given the diversity and age.

As far as representation and accuracy go, the B&W prints are, based on your our testimonies, perfect representationally. I didn't get to see any of the color films, which are known for their debates on color accuracy on DVD, so it will be interesting to get a compare and contrast on those, as well.
Yeah I was tempted to see a color film, but I was at the tail end of my vacation the day they showed Late Spring so it was just the most convenient.

Everything you said I agree with. There were definitely a few exchanges left un-subbed. The one constant is that if a phrase got repeated ("oh yea?" "yeah" "yeah?" "yeah"...something to that effect), the first time it was said it was subbed, but it wouldn't be after that.

And there is talk earlier in this thread about subtitles during the concert they go to: the song was definitely not subtitled, which apparently contrasts with the Criterion release.

Post Reply