823 The In-Laws

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

823 The In-Laws

#1 Post by swo17 » Mon Apr 18, 2016 6:47 pm

The In-Laws

Image Image

Peter Falk and Alan Arkin make for a hilarious dream team in this beloved American sidesplitter. Directed by Arthur Hiller from an ingenious script by Andrew Bergman, The In-Laws may at first seem like a generic meet-the-parents comedy, as Arkin's mild-mannered dentist suspiciously eyes Falk's volatile mystery man, whose son is engaged to his daughter. But soon, through a series of events too serpentine and surprising to spoil, the two men are brought together by a dangerous mission that takes them from suburban New Jersey to Honduras. Fueled by elaborate stunt work and the laconic, naturalistic charms of its two stars, The In-Laws deserves its status as a madcap classic—and has continued to draw ardent fans in the years since its release.

SPECIAL FEATURES

• New 2K digital restoration, with uncompressed monaural soundtrack on the Blu-ray
• Audio commentary from 2003 featuring director Arthur Hiller, actors Alan Arkin and Peter Falk, and writer Andrew Bergman
• New interview with Arkin
In Support of "The In-Laws," a new interview program featuring actors Ed Begley Jr., Nancy Dussault, James Hong, and David Paymer
• Trailer
• PLUS: A booklet featuring an essay by comedy writer Stephen Winer and a 2011 recollection of the making of the film by Hiller

User avatar
The Narrator Returns
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#2 Post by The Narrator Returns » Mon Apr 18, 2016 6:50 pm

And it has an honest-to-god booklet!

SquidLips
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 10:17 pm

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#3 Post by SquidLips » Mon Apr 18, 2016 10:30 pm

This is probably not a forum fav (judging by the silence in the room) but I'm glad some of these well made 70s drama/comedies are getting some good treatment. Arkin is great in this!

flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#4 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Fri Apr 22, 2016 12:24 am

I haven't seen it but I did see some of the ill-advised 2003 remake with Michael Douglas and Albert Brooks on television once. I would almost blind-buy this because of the people involved, and I've heard Kevin Pollak talk it up on his show saying it was his favorite movie. It's too bad Criterion couldn't have gotten him in for a video piece since he does an impeccable impression of both the leads.

User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#5 Post by cdnchris » Fri Apr 22, 2016 9:33 am

I'm not too surprised there isn't more talk. I haven't seen this in years and I like it a lot, but I have a feeling certain members won't care for it much, if at all. The villain in the movie may prove a little much for starters. From what I remember it's pretty broad and sometimes feels like it's constantly throwing whatever joke/gag it can at the wall to see what sticks, but a lot of it sticks and the film has a great energy to it thanks mostly to Falk and Arkin. Falk's particularly good. His character is, in the end, quite insane, and I think a lot of actors would have played him over the top (Douglas goes a little silly with it in the rather bad remake) but Falk plays him completely straight, which makes it a lot funnier.

I'm curious what the reactions will be when members start watching it.

User avatar
sir_luke
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:55 pm

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#6 Post by sir_luke » Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:47 pm

Blu-ray.com


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#7 Post by domino harvey » Sat Jul 09, 2016 6:42 pm

cdnchris wrote:I'm curious what the reactions will be when members start watching it.
Well, apart from possible technical issues, let's first acknowledge that Criterion dropped the ball by not commissioning black velvet art for the packaging! I thought the film gave itself an apt description midway through when Arkin describes Falk as heavily flawed but still oddly likable. I didn't think the movie was funny (I maybe chuckled twice near the end), but it had a certain charm to it nevertheless. I doubt I'll ever watch it again, but I've sat through too many films that couldn't even rise to the level of decent-enough distraction, so that's something I guess

User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#8 Post by cdnchris » Sat Jul 09, 2016 6:50 pm

I still laughed through it. The part that surprised me was
SpoilerShow
I ended up losing it with the hand puppet. Not laughing real hard, mind you, but giggling where I had a hard time stopping.
But most of the laughs, for me, come from Arkin's reactions to the situation and a few good lines. I'm still a bit surprised they chose it honestly, but like you said, it is a decent distraction at least.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#9 Post by domino harvey » Sat Jul 09, 2016 6:54 pm

Honestly I thought Arkin
SpoilerShow
quietly lowering his daughter's hand holding the envelope of money while talking to Ed Begley Jr
was the funniest bit of subtle humor. I could see how this could be a movie like Fletch where it gets funnier the more you see it/are around those who like it

calculus entrophy
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2014 11:32 am

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#10 Post by calculus entrophy » Sat Jul 09, 2016 7:12 pm

Very much so. I generally appreciate any references to flies with beaks, or the Guacamole Act of 1917.

User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#11 Post by matrixschmatrix » Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:07 am

This is one of those movies where whenever it was not focused on the leads it dies almost immediately, but it's a lot of fun just to let Arkin and Falk goof around, and fun to see Falk essentially playing a sillier version of his Columbo character. I feel like whomever got this attached to Criterion must have been the same one who got Hopscotch in the collection- there's a similar action-spy-comedy vibe, and they both feel like someone's dad's favorite movie. Remaking something this based on the charm of the specific actors seems like a bizarre idea, though.

skeets kelly
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#12 Post by skeets kelly » Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:45 pm

I have not seen this since i was a kid, so I recalled virtually nothing about it, but i was surprised how funny it is. It's escalating absurdity is anchored by Arkin's performance, and his innocence through the first two acts of the film. There's some real sly exchanges between Arkin and Falk, and I think that's what keeps it from going completely off the rails. I mean, the insanity that spins around them as they are the eye of the storm.

Also, please someone give Simon a proper home video release.

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#13 Post by tenia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:25 pm

I wasn't expecting particularly a lot from it, but ended up being positively surprised. While no masterpiece, it has a pace on gags and jokes and an incredible Peter Falk in it which are just a treat. It drags a bit in the middle though, but the more the movie goes, the more madcap it goes (even though the opening dinner and Falk's story sets quite a high bar to being with). The James Hong sequence probably had me the most (and, as a more subtle gag, the time spent by Tom counting the bills in the enveloppe).

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#14 Post by zedz » Sun Feb 26, 2017 6:49 pm

I found this for the most part lame and ordinary, but it sparked into life whenever it got particularly insane, with the extremely silly antics of James Hong and Richard Libertini being the highlights for me (the latter almost single-handedly turns this into a Marx Brothers movie for five minutes). Falk and Arkin make the rest of it watchable, so it passed the time adequately. Everybody involved in the film, if we're to believe the extras, seems to think it's some kind of masterpiece, so lucky them, I guess!

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#15 Post by knives » Fri Sep 08, 2017 11:50 am

This isn't indexed in the top thread. As to the film itself I'll agree with everyone else that it isn't particularly good, but thankfully enough of the actors are on their A game to make it work mostly.

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#16 Post by swo17 » Fri Sep 08, 2017 11:55 am

knives wrote:This isn't indexed in the top thread.
Fixed

flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#17 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Thu Sep 14, 2017 12:37 pm

I liked it. There are a lot of subtle things going on which add to the humor. Not laugh-out-loud stuff, but clever enough to make you (or me at least) smile. This has been done much better since, particularly with Midnight Run in terms of mixing action and unabashed comedy.

black&huge
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2017 5:35 am

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#18 Post by black&huge » Fri Jun 04, 2021 5:38 pm

I do remember the lack of reaction and excitement when this was revealed to be entering the collection and I do not remember much from when I first watched it shortly after the fact but I just completed a rewatch and this is very enjoyable. I do echo Chris' comment the most where a lot of it that makes it humurous is Arkin's hysterical reactions to most of the situations and dialogue. Personally though this has always been a fail safe in comedies for me and it's the reason why John Waters' early films I find hilarious: just loud and annoying reactions and deliveries which orinically I absolutely HATE in real life. Aside from all that I found the escalating sequence of events to be great as well. I do disagree that the few moments the leads aren't in the picture the film dies I think it keeps its pace quite incredibly all throughout.

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: 823 The In-Laws

#19 Post by therewillbeblus » Fri Jun 04, 2021 5:47 pm

I haven't seen this in a while (though I watched it plenty as a kid, and revisited it once when Criterion put it out.. it's been five years already?) but I'm with zedz on Richard Libertini stealing the show

Post Reply